• Welcome to the Fable Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Fable series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

Rant on Story Pacing [MINOR SPOILERS]

Status
Not open for further replies.

Autarch

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2010
Messages
323
Reaction score
50
Points
60
Age
32
I'm not going to say that I am the greatest writer in the world, nor even - I suspect - at all competent. However, any child would know when a story is poorly paced. It doesn't feel right, it doesn't feel good, it doesn't feel well written. When you view the story, you think in your heart, "This is not how this story should be laid out. This should not happen here, this should not happen there, this should not be so short." It is easily possible to tell when a story has very, very bad pacing.

So, why the hell is Fable 3's pacing ****ed up so much?

When I first heard the plot, I thought to myself, "Hmm, Autarch, this sounds like a three arc storyline taking place in two countries. The hero starts out adventuring in his homeland (Arc 1: The Journey Begins), ventures to find allies in Aurora (Arc 2: Stranger in a Strange Land) and then returns home to be triumphant and sit on the throne as king to plan out a fight with the Aurorans he's ****ed off or something (Arc 3: Return of the King)." This was before I knew we weren't fighting the Aurorans, but I digress.

Anyhow, the storyline is set up like this. It was a perfect set up for a rather massive three arc storyline. I could see it planned out in my head so vividly it was beautiful. A typical classic "growing up" story with a neat twist at the end.

And, instead, we got this poorly planned, poorly paced, utterly moronically designed plot. Instead of three fully grown arcs, we got one fully grown arc and two malformed and sickly runts that were put down hilariously swiftly. Truly, how quickly was the Hero out of Aurora and onto the throne? And then how quickly off making important decisions off the throne and onto just a normal Fable game ending?

Don't get me started on the Nightcrawler and his utter lack of antagonism for an entire in-game year. What a good way to build suspense, drama, anticipation for the final battle with an ultimate evil... By having him do nothing! You'd already revealed his hand in the fight in Aurora, why the **** did you not include more skirmishes etc with shadows? They were your final enemies and, going through the storyline, I saw them TWICE. The Hero-King should be protecting his people as well as ruling over them, why were there not attacks by shadows? I DON'T GET IT.

We all know why this happened, of course. We all know why Aurora (a place we'd never seen before and would've loved to have explored) was about five areas of repeating terrain. We all know why mechanics were cut and the Hero was only on the throne for about an hour. We ALL know why the game seems so gammy handed and poorly paced.

It was ****ing rushed out within two years. I'm sure the writers did a brilliant job of writing the scripts and the plot. I'm sure the game designers had a perfect design in mind. And I'm sure that the developers would've been happy to work for a bit longer in order to iron out any flaws.

But, no, it was a two year job. Rush the game out, collect full price of money for something that should've been half of that and then release DLC to patch up the holes. There's only so much people can do in two years, and evidently it wasn't enough to fix Fable 3's terrible pacing issues. (Nor it's bugs or it's mechanics, but you know how it is.)

I'm not certain I'll buy the next Fable, if it's rushed in the same way. I'm not sure I'll buy any other Lionhead game, due to Molyneux's desire to change things for the sake of changing them and then not fixing the problems that are broken.

It annoys me that Fable 3 is a game that could've been given another year of development and polish and been one of the contenders for greatest game of all time but, due to greed and human stupidity, is now resigned to the depths of mediocrity on a rushed release cycle.

Autarch out.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
847
Reaction score
12
Points
60
I'm not going to say that I am the greatest writer in the world, nor even - I suspect - at all competent. However, any child would know when a story is poorly paced. It doesn't feel right, it doesn't feel good, it doesn't feel well written. When you view the story, you think in your heart, "This is not how this story should be laid out. This should not happen here, this should not happen there, this should not be so short." It is easily possible to tell when a story has very, very bad pacing.

So, why the hell is Fable 3's pacing f***** up so much?

When I first heard the plot, I thought to myself, "Hmm, Autarch, this sounds like a three arc storyline taking place in two countries. The hero starts out adventuring in his homeland (Arc 1: The Journey Begins), ventures to find allies in Aurora (Arc 2: Stranger in a Strange Land) and then returns home to be triumphant and sit on the throne as king to plan out a fight with the Aurorans he's ****ed off or something (Arc 3: Return of the King)." This was before I knew we weren't fighting the Aurorans, but I digress.

Anyhow, the storyline is set up like this. It was a perfect set up for a rather massive three arc storyline. I could see it planned out in my head so vividly it was beautiful. A typical classic "growing up" story with a neat twist at the end.

And, instead, we got this poorly planned, poorly paced, utterly moronically designed plot. Instead of three fully grown arcs, we got one fully grown arc and two malformed and sickly runts that were put down hilariously swiftly. Truly, how quickly was the Hero out of Aurora and onto the throne? And then how quickly off making important decisions off the throne and onto just a normal Fable game ending?

Don't get me started on the Nightcrawler and his utter lack of antagonism for an entire in-game year. What a good way to build suspense, drama, anticipation for the final battle with an ultimate evil... By having him do nothing! You'd already revealed his hand in the fight in Aurora, why the f*** did you not include more skirmishes etc with shadows? They were your final enemies and, going through the storyline, I saw them TWICE. The Hero-King should be protecting his people as well as ruling over them, why were there not attacks by shadows? I DON'T GET IT.

We all know why this happened, of course. We all know why Aurora (a place we'd never seen before and would've loved to have explored) was about five areas of repeating terrain. We all know why mechanics were cut and the Hero was only on the throne for about an hour. We ALL know why the game seems so gammy handed and poorly paced.

It was f****** rushed out within two years. I'm sure the writers did a brilliant job of writing the scripts and the plot. I'm sure the game designers had a perfect design in mind. And I'm sure that the developers would've been happy to work for a bit longer in order to iron out any flaws.

But, no, it was a two year job. Rush the game out, collect full price of money for something that should've been half of that and then release DLC to patch up the holes. There's only so much people can do in two years, and evidently it wasn't enough to fix Fable 3's terrible pacing issues. (Nor it's bugs or it's mechanics, but you know how it is.)

I'm not certain I'll buy the next Fable, if it's rushed in the same way. I'm not sure I'll buy any other Lionhead game, due to Molyneux's desire to change things for the sake of changing them and then not fixing the problems that are broken.

It annoys me that Fable 3 is a game that could've been given another year of development and polish and been one of the contenders for greatest game of all time but, due to greed and human stupidity, is now resigned to the depths of mediocrity on a rushed release cycle.

Autarch out.
Totally agree, if somebody wanted to,you could beat the main story twice in one day.I figured the Aurorins would be like albion,(as in a whole country), but instead we get this sashay of a town with nothing of worth in it, and on top of it all, it ruined my dreams of a massive war with actual beings when i heard about the shadows.As for the pace, i mentioned above that the story not only goes to fast but when i became king on my first and second playthroughs, i actually wanted to be king! not have to choices for like 8 situations.
 

Matt_352

Active Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
120
Reaction score
1
Points
25
Age
33
I agree 100% I kept on having this feeling of being rushed through the story, You don't get to make anywhere near as many decisions as what you should be able to do, and this whole darkness crap is just unacceptable to me as an invasion from Aurora. Their should of been a whole third of the game devoted to being in Aurora, which to be honest was pretty bland I thought.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2010
Messages
847
Reaction score
12
Points
60
I agree 100% I kept on having this feeling of being rushed through the story, You don't get to make anywhere near as many decisions as what you should be able to do, and this whole darkness crap is just unacceptable to me as an invasion from Aurora. Their should of been a whole third of the game devoted to being in Aurora, which to be honest was pretty bland I thought.
Exacly, the way peter talked about it was like they would be as albion was, as in be human, and as for him sayin it being bigger than aurora? i would punch tha hell out of peter.
 

Fable 3 FTW

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
102
Reaction score
10
Points
55
I have not completed the game for the reason that I am taking it very slowly and just running around the world messing around because of certain people I have doubts that the game ending is any good thats why im stalling. :blush:
 

Jacobson17J

New Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Points
1
Age
31
I am very disappointed in the game, it wasnt long enough at all. There arent even many more sidequests I can do after I beat it. I thought fable 3 was going to be better than both the other fables but after playing it I think its the worst of the three.
 

Kahindes

Active Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2010
Messages
53
Reaction score
5
Points
25
I took my time with this game. My boyfriend rushed through his and gave me the hint that I needed alot of money to be as good as I ususally am in this game. Proved him wrong though, I got more then enough gold to save all the people of Alibion and I did all the Good choices all throughout the game. The second half of the game was very rushed though. If I hadn't have had a hint given to me then I would never have been able to get the money in time. It was rather unfair the amount of days that went by after just doing a simple quest.
 

Bluedrake

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
274
Reaction score
8
Points
50
I agree there. The story was very rushed. All in all, I am kinda disappointed with Fable 3. I avoided all the hype and articles, but still I am feeling let down. The amount of sidequests is ridiculously low. I just need to collect the keys, gnomes and stuff like that, but collection kind of quests were never all that interesting to me. Average game, all in all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top