Seriously, I say things only to get a message across, but people attack my message and destroy the meaning behind it. Right now you're already frantically searching for a typo before you learn something. Basically I was on this other forums, and I used some clever symbolism to get a good message out. It was about Jesus and I was using him as a metaphor. But everyone completely attacked me and destroyed my thread, I don't even think they ever understood what I was saying in the first place. You wouldn't read an essay without the conclusion statement. Otherwise just don't. Basically I said that Jesus gave up world domination and wanted people to return to the old ways and be insync with mother nature. I said Jesus was the Sun of God, and he sacrificed himself on the cross. Forming the feminine principle. See the meaning, the interpretation? I was using it as a metaphor. How many people actually believe Jesus was God incarnate? Exactly, just a parable to get the message across. But everyone attacked my essay saying stupid crap like there is no historical evidence, of course not! Jesus wasn't even written down until 3 centuries after his time by people who never met him. I've just been noticing this theme lately, by destroying my typing or historical backing they can ruin the foundation, they're not even interested in what I have to say they just want to argue it out of existence. If I said something simple like, humans aren't mammals because all mammals live within their means so humans are a virus. I don't literally mean you are a virus but you'd say something like, humans are homo sapiens, what about bacteria, we discovered the missing link point null. It's really dumb. Sure you won you're right you created an argument and voted yourself the winner but you never even got to the point of what I was saying you completely missed target and learned nothing. Do you guys ever have problems communicating with intelligent people? Did you even understand the point I was making with this thread or am I truly that horrible?