Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

[Robmokron]

Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

Will your entire gamerscore affect the morphing, or just the fable games?

and does anyone know about locking the morphing with weapons?

I mean, if i like a weapon how it looks, shouldn't i be able to keep it

 

[POOP]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

From what other people have said, only Fable III achievements.

 

[The Invisible Hero]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

gamerscore... pwhahahah

 

[Albion Knight]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

I believe that it is your whole gaming score. It's a seed number not a "higher is better" number. Imagine a table with possible starter weapons. Let's say there as many as 100 per type. The gamer score is put into a formula and the result which would be a number between 1 and 100 or 0 and 99. An example of this would be gammerscore of 9335. Divide by 5 =1,867 square that 3,485,689 take the last two digits and look up the starter. Another thing is that 89 isn't better or worse than any other weapon just different.

 

[tjbyrum1]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

Well I mean, if you like the way a weapon looks... shouldn't it stay like that?

Like... it doesn't just simply 'change', it grows with you. So if you do something to make that weapon change (And you like it), you will probably continue doing just that.

Actually idk.

 

[GrimWhim]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

Why would they make the gamerscore affect anything?

 

[Benjamin510]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

Why would they make the gamerscore affect anything?

for a stupid reason. It was already comfrimed and it is just a stupid idea. I ask everyone, why?

 

[GrimWhim]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

for a stupid reason. It was already comfrimed and it is just a stupid idea. I ask everyone, why?

I completely agree. Why do they have so many great ideas but then screw it up with idiotic ideas that only hinder their players? Blech. If I wasn't so obsessed and excited about Fable III, I'd completely forgo buying the Limited Edition copy and wait until it dropped in price.

 

[Benjamin510]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

I completely agree. Why do they have so many great ideas but then screw it up with idiotic ideas that only hinder their players? Blech. If I wasn't so obsessed and excited about Fable III, I'd completely forgo buying the Limited Edition copy and wait until it dropped in price.

Exactly. The only way this would work would be like this quote:

I believe that it is your whole gaming score. It's a seed number not a "higher is better" number. Imagine a table with possible starter weapons. Let's say there as many as 100 per type. The gamer score is put into a formula and the result which would be a number between 1 and 100 or 0 and 99. An example of this would be gammerscore of 9335. Divide by 5 =1,867 square that 3,485,689 take the last two digits and look up the starter. Another thing is that 89 isn't better or worse than any other weapon just different.

 

[king_reaver]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

find morph from gamescore fun

 

[Syth the old one]

Re: Gamerscore: Fable III, Fable 2 or ALL?

I believe that it is your whole gaming score. It's a seed number not a "higher is better" number. Imagine a table with possible starter weapons. Let's say there as many as 100 per type. The gamer score is put into a formula and the result which would be a number between 1 and 100 or 0 and 99. An example of this would be gammerscore of 9335. Divide by 5 =1,867 square that 3,485,689 take the last two digits and look up the starter. Another thing is that 89 isn't better or worse than any other weapon just different.

Ahhh all those numbers It hurts but yeah i would have to say this is the most logical answer