Nice... sure, but it kinda detracts from the whole "doing good for its own sake" thing that should be going on.
Yeah. So you're not good. It was too tempting to resist, so you condemned your sister to death.
The rewards for good and evil *shouldn't* be even, how can you squeeze any moral dillemma out of that sort of situation?
"Oooo, I can either spare the man's life and get 1000 gold, or I can kill him and get 1000 gold! Decisions, decisions!"
There should always be plenty of: "Should I spare the man's life, do the right thing, but not get anything out of it... or should I kill him and steal all his riches?"
It makes you just have to make the choice, between good and evil.
Yeah good isn't all about cash, but It still should have it's rewards.