- Joined
- Apr 10, 2007
- Messages
- 4,234
- Reaction score
- 269
- Points
- 265
- Age
- 31
Call of Duty 4; Modern Warfare, or Call of Duty: World at War?
Which game do you prefer out of the two? Explain why.
To me, I personally like Call of Duty 4 more, because it has an intriguing story, and it sucks you in. The first time that you play it, it is very intense, and very fun. The online is much better and well balanced.
Call of Duty: World at War on the other hand... The spawning sucks. killstreak reward for the artillery strike is too long and useless, everyone has time to run, the dogs are overpowered and can be everywhere at once, overpowered weapons, scopes somehow make a bolt action rifle stronger, flamethrowers are too powerful, and molotov cocktails are absolutely underpowered and useless. Overall a bad game. WWII has been done and redone to the point it wants to make me barf. At least I didn't have to storm the beaches of France again. I would have shot a goat if I had to. Try a Vietnam game, that would be interesting. But leave that to Infinity Ward. They can do it right.
Which game do you prefer out of the two? Explain why.
To me, I personally like Call of Duty 4 more, because it has an intriguing story, and it sucks you in. The first time that you play it, it is very intense, and very fun. The online is much better and well balanced.
Call of Duty: World at War on the other hand... The spawning sucks. killstreak reward for the artillery strike is too long and useless, everyone has time to run, the dogs are overpowered and can be everywhere at once, overpowered weapons, scopes somehow make a bolt action rifle stronger, flamethrowers are too powerful, and molotov cocktails are absolutely underpowered and useless. Overall a bad game. WWII has been done and redone to the point it wants to make me barf. At least I didn't have to storm the beaches of France again. I would have shot a goat if I had to. Try a Vietnam game, that would be interesting. But leave that to Infinity Ward. They can do it right.