i'm still not convinced that the article is false. the second one never really disproved it or pointed out why it didn't work, it just said there wasn't very much testing done and elaborated about how much we don't know. personally i'd like to read something a bit more specific about why DCA does not work, otherwise i'll just end up hating drug companies even more... they're only the most vilified businesses in the capital economy.
if i were to get cancer, i'd rather go through DCA treatment than chemo. i'd gladly volunteer for that rather than be hooked up to tubes and live miserably for months so that i might survive. if it forwards science or cancer research, so be it.
if i were to get cancer, i'd rather go through DCA treatment than chemo. i'd gladly volunteer for that rather than be hooked up to tubes and live miserably for months so that i might survive. if it forwards science or cancer research, so be it.
