Chase;430906 said:This is why fans shouldn't make video game extensions. Fable series is great, and futuristic would not only ruin the point, but change it completely. It would be like star wars or something, and not Fable. It has made a name of itself for being in its time era. I think we should respect that.
GrimWhim;431083 said:Err... I don't think you realize how far into the future we've already gone. Go play the original Fable, then the second Fable and then look at all the stuff in Fable III. You'd think a lot differently if you did. Besides, steampunk technology isn't exactly something I'd call "futuristic".
Ryu_the_fox;430842 said:Thing is though, like for a final game, I would wish they'd let us choose an era of time for us. Like say the final game we travel as an immortal from beginning of the fable universe to an end. And once the game be completed we can choose era's we'd like to live in via time machine.
Rat;431100 said:Isn't Steampunk tech just how we would have technology in modern times if we actually still clung to steam-powered wonders. With some futuristic stuff like robots and all that jazz.
I could easily see a clockwork hobbe coming into a game.
POOP;431299 said:I hope that there is no Fable IV. There is no reason. If Fable III is fantastic, ground-breaking awesomeness then they should end the series with that, rather than to fade into obscurity and crappiness that will cost me $120 for the next two games. If Fable III sucks, then it's pretty obvious why they shouldn't continue. The same for if it's okay. Three tries is enough. If you don't make a landmark game by then, then you should move on.
Also, I know P.M. already confirmed Fable IV and Fable V. I just don't think that's good. The development of a sequel should be dependent on the reception of its predecessor.
POOP;431299 said:I hope that there is no Fable IV. There is no reason. If Fable III is fantastic, ground-breaking awesomeness then they should end the series with that, rather than to fade into obscurity and crappiness that will cost me $120 for the next two games. If Fable III sucks, then it's pretty obvious why they shouldn't continue. The same for if it's okay. Three tries is enough. If you don't make a landmark game by then, then you should move on.
Also, I know P.M. already confirmed Fable IV and Fable V. I just don't think that's good. The development of a sequel should be dependent on the reception of its predecessor.
DiamondFlair;431466 said:Final Fantasy 7 disagrees with you.