Fable Three.

[nhermida97]

Fable Three.

When would it take place? What is your wishlist? Whar would the story be about? What would you take out of fable two that would not be in fable three? What would be the online play? You add more stuff if you want to.

 

[CertainDeath]

Re: Fable Three.

They should definitely do something about the co-op camera.

 

[SimonKalevra]

Re: Fable Three.

And the dye system too

 

[Warpedhero]

Re: Fable Three.

I just hope they don't turn it into a modern game. I like the medieval-renaissance feel of it.

 

[Zarkes]

Re: Fable Three.

Ugh when magic doesn't exist (Scythe unlocks hidden powers in you) The story wewd be stopping the world from evil eghr something while rebiulding the heroes giuld ad bringing back magic.I mean will. I wewd take out the crappy spell system, retarted religions and I wewd add Skorm and Avo (even if they are fake it's a religion so people wewd believe in them) put back hotkeyeng add jumping more monsters, augs and many secret places. The online stuff wewd be you in control of your camera, you can bring your character in their world. You wewd have fame or infamy in your world but if you did enough in their world people wewd talk of you there. Also the apparel wewd be fitting to the time with 10x the selection and you can find secret clothing like platemail or wizards robes in dungeons or by doing a certain quest. Also only one legendary cape either black with chains or white with gold depending on the choice you made (also you kewd get both from trading) mmm thats it for now.

 

[RoG iGreatGoose]

Re: Fable Three.

Fable 3 should take place during like the 1600s?
Fable 4 should be modern
Fable 5 should be in the future.

 

[Saphystar]

Re: Fable Three.

Fable 3 should take place during like the 1600s?
Fable 4 should be modern
Fable 5 should be in the future.

ooh now that would be mad! (a good mad lol) but i love the period it is in.

Wish we could ACTUALY see other peoples heros in game, interact with them more, join groups to do quests or fight :ninja: However i know this would never happen lol

 

[Zamurick]

Re: Fable Three.

Actually bringing your own hero into someone else's world as well as seeing people and not just orbs seems like a good idea. It doesn't seem to unlikely either, but it would only be good if you were able to walk through other heroes. Otherwise everywhere would be so cluttered you wouldn't be able to go anywhere.

 

[Saphystar]

Re: Fable Three.

Actually bringing your own hero into someone else's world as well as seeing people and not just orbs seems like a good idea. It doesn't seem to unlikely either, but it would only be good if you were able to walk through other heroes. Otherwise everywhere would be so cluttered you wouldn't be able to go anywhere.

Yeah and not to mention very laggy! yeah thats great idea about walking through other people. Keeping the way you can interact with them as you do now.

Would not feel so lonely in the game then :'(

 

[anain12]

Re: Fable Three.

Fable 3 should take place during like the 1600s?
Fable 4 should be modern
Fable 5 should be in the future.

I would actually like that. A little change can never hurt .

 

[darkside7610]

Re: Fable Three.

So...what made you choose the "path of light"? so to speak...and how much easier is it to perform good deeds that reward you with fewer "light points"?

 

[darkside7610]

Re: Fable Three.

How effecient is the co-op gameplay in Fable 2?

 

[moonfever]

Re: Fable Three.

How effecient is the co-op gameplay in Fable 2?

I love coop, but the camera angles are a little off. It's harder to shoot gargoyles in coop.

 

[im 4 da win]

Re: Fable Three.

camera angles suck its still a great game overall tho

i think if any fable was in the future id stop playin it

 

[Skormsarrow]

Re: Fable Three.

Fable 3 should take place during like the 1600s?
Fable 4 should be modern
Fable 5 should be in the future.

nah fable 3 would have to be a very short period after 2 would have to involve Thersea and the spire to a certain degree

fable 4 modern nah keeping in mind fable 1 + 2 were set thousands of year ago not hundereds which would make so there wouldnt really be any histroy records of the first 3 and if there was it would seem silly

and fable5 in the future that i guess u would mean acient magic and future ristic weps im sure theres a game out there very much like that just dont think the time sense would make sense all togeather

 

[Hexen_Harlot]

Re: Fable Three.

Thousands of years ago is pre-Roman mate. Fable 1 was medieval, i'm not sure when, 1400s? So 600 years ago. I'd hate a modern fable, but one with time travelling seems like the logical progression. That way, even if there were modern areas, you could stay out of them. It would be great to see how chracters changed in each era. I also lilke the idea of rebuilding the guild or saving an already evil world... or having the evil option to just take the despot's place . Time travel would means loads of clothes and weps from every era. and yes, co-op needs more.

 

[SimonKalevra]

Re: Fable Three.

I wanna seethe old kingdom and beat the Queen of blades, Knight of blades and Jack of blades (yes one last time) ^_^

 

[Hexen_Harlot]

Re: Fable Three.

Ahh, old kingdomw ould have to be one of the eras... that would eb totally king arthur styl ei'm sure, plenty of dragons and damsels in distress (hopefulyl unique weddable ones)

 

[Blade Mr.DK]

Re: Fable Three.

Fable 3 should take place during like the 1600s?
Fable 4 should be modern
Fable 5 should be in the future.

but i swear a fable is an old story, so how could it be modern or future?=]

 

[Zamurick]

Re: Fable Three.

Fable II co-op would be much better if (even if for only XBL co-op) you didn't have to share the camera. I can understand sharing the camera in couch co-op, but I don't see why it has to be on XBL.