Final Harry Potter Trailer

[D3m190d]

Whaaaaaa? :O

That's practically the same thing as... not liking to eat or not liking to sleep.

Well, the difference is that eating and sleeping are pretty much necessary to stay alive.

Oh, and I just find books pretty boring. THAT'S JUST MY OPINION. To me, they're just a bunch of pieces of paper stitched together, with f**ktons of letters on them. They... tire me. /=|

 

[HobbeBrain]

i read all the books, so i enjoy them.

consider the movie watchmen. i think it's the worst piece of high budget trash i have ever laid eyes on, yet people who read the graphic novels seemed to enjoy it. despite that, each harry potter movie is at least over 9000 times better than watchmen. the two are only related in being book-to-movie adaptations.

I've never actually seen Watchmen, but I will take your word for it.

 

[Shadowfiend]

Well, the difference is that eating and sleeping are pretty much necessary to stay alive.

I know. I don't see a difference between the three. :troll:

To me, they're just a bunch of pieces of paper stitched together, with f**ktons of letters on them. They... tire me. /=|

It tires you to read words? It tires you to THINK? No. You know what? It's cool. Forget I said anything. This has gone to an uncomfortable place. No doubt you are a pretty awesome dude with above average intelligence and many marketable skills. We're cool, alright? You don't like to read books and I'm not going to judge you for it.

 

[D3m190d]

I know. I don't see a difference between the three. :troll:


It tires you to read words? It tires you to THINK? No. You know what? It's cool. Forget I said anything. This has gone to an uncomfortable place. No doubt you are a pretty awesome dude with above average intelligence and many marketable skills. We're cool, alright? You don't like to read books and I'm not going to judge you for it.

Thanks! ^_^ And I don't think you're boring because you do read books.

 

[Zarkes]

Yeah part 1 sucked. The first movie will always be the best.

 

[HobbeBrain]

Yeah part 1 sucked. The first movie will always be the best.

Really? Number 3 > Number 1.

 

[Zarkes]

Nahh I was about the same age as Daniel Radcliffe in the first one and it made me want to read the books, never did though.The first one was the best "You're a wizard Harry" Everything was new.

They waited to long to make the third one he got all old for the time period and they had to give him a goofy boyish hairstyle.

 

[HobbeBrain]

Nahh I was about the same age as Daniel Radcliffe in the first one and it made me want to read the books, never did though.The first one was the best "You're a wizard Harry" Everything was new.

They waited to long to make the third one he got all old for the time period and they had to give him a goofy boyish hairstyle.

How old was he when they filmed number 3?

 

[Zarkes]

The character was 13 but he was 15. It was a great movie though.

Its weird to think about but I guess I grew up alongside the Harry potter series. That guy has been playing Harry Potter for about a decade now.

 

[HobbeBrain]

Yeah, but to be fair it'd have to have been a movie a year if they wanted him to be the right age all the time... I think they did a good enough job to be honest, except he's like 20 now...