Denying that religion (read: Christianity) has set human development back hundreds, if not thousands, of years by oppressing and silencing people such as Galileo is plain silly.
Human civilization actually got pretty intelligent during the Greek era. Once the Roman Empire fell and the dark ages begun, and Christianity began to spread as the dominant religion, a lot of that knowledge was lost and indeed science was supressed for quite a while, until the Renaissance came along.Denying that religion (read: Christianity) has set human development back hundreds, if not thousands, of years by oppressing and silencing people such as Galileo is plain silly.
Denying that religion (read: Christianity) has set human development back hundreds, if not thousands, of years by oppressing and silencing people such as Galileo is plain silly.
That question for real son? Even if you are as anti-religion as possible denying the importance of it is just plain silly.
EDIT:
Didn't see JohnDoe's reply up there.
Denying that religion (read: Christianity) has set human development back hundreds, if not thousands, of years by oppressing and silencing people such as Galileo is plain silly.
One thing that I don't understand is America, once a land free of any one religion and allowing people to follow whatever they want, now being converted into a land more religious than Ireland, all the laws being made there against Atheist's and for Christians is ridiculous.
its illegal to buy booze on sundays in certain states.
I've always wondered about that. When they find out that I lied all this time, I can say that I wasn't forced to speak the truth all the time, because I don't believe in god and what the bible says, right? Don't get me wrong, I'd probably want to speak the truth, but they better give me good science book. Or even a piece of paper with a fact I'm sure of, like ''2+2=4.''While we're on the subject, I've always wondered:
Can you refuse to swear on The Bible in an American courtroom, or acknowledge the "so help me God" part of the oath?
True that. Though, if I had to swear on an object, I'd choose a woman. :troll:I wouldn't really care about swearing on any kind of book. I'd much rather give them my word of honour that I'd be telling the truth than swear on some object. My own personal honour feels much more serious a promise.
THANK GOD. Wait...In the states, there is no law that mandates that a person must swear on any book or under any god. For instance, the ceremony for the presidential oath as outlined in our constitution makes no mention of the bible or other holy book, nor does it say anything about any god. The same is true in the courtroom, you don't have to swear on a bible nor under any god. It's purely customary and makes no difference. In court, simply say that you would prefer to swear or affirm or attest or whatever, I forget what the term is, and they'll go through with it minus the bible.
In the states, there is no law that mandates that a person must swear on any book or under any god. For instance, the ceremony for the presidential oath as outlined in our constitution makes no mention of the bible or other holy book, nor does it say anything about any god. The same is true in the courtroom, you don't have to swear on a bible nor under any god. It's purely customary and makes no difference. In court, simply say that you would prefer to swear or affirm or attest or whatever, I forget what the term is, and they'll go through with it minus the bible.