Monsters.

[Vero Caerso]

Monsters.

I dont know if any of you have actually considered how easy it is to kill all of the creatures in fable II.

Yeah, its not such a bad thing that you can kill things easily but i dont know about the rest of you but i would prefer a challenge rather than having monsters that i can kill in like one shot.



I dont know how easy people find to kill Banshees but it only takes me acouple of blows from my dragonfire gun or what ever its called to kill it.

Everythings too easy on there, not like they can do anything about it now but im just saying that it should of been alittle harder for people to kill the creatures in fable II.

 

[Arladerus]

Re: Monsters.

The game isn't about the difficulty; it's about the experience.

 

[Daemon300]

Re: Monsters.

Liezz all liezzz.

The game is about having fun.

 

[Terminal Hapiness]

Re: Monsters.

Yea, Fable II is one of the only games that's not actually meant to be challenging. It's simply about having fun with it.

 

[hobbes_pwn]

Re: Monsters.

It is all meant to be about fun... Except See The Future. Lionhead said the DLC was aimed for the more hardcore fans, and it is alot harder. I don't have it so i can't say if it is true

 

[Vero Caerso]

Re: Monsters.

I'm not saying that it shouldnt be for fun im just saying that they could of just made it alittle for difficult for the people who want to be able to try and kill really hard things.

I mean yeah i enjoy the game but i also like a challenge. Im not saying anything against the game or anything im just saying it could of been alittle for difficult.

 

[sfroggy1]

Re: Monsters.

I know what you mean Vero. They should have it in a set difficulties section in the pause menu (good idea for Fable III):

- Easy
- Normal
- Hard
- INSANE ! ! ! Imagine if it was gears of War insane tho :O

lolz, but seriously i understand where u are coming from

 

[Vero Caerso]

Re: Monsters.

Thats good then, i hate being the only one who thinks things. I know they should be doing that but we dont want to be copying other games now do we? Its not like it needs it, i mean games are about having fun but some people like a challenge not all, but some.

 

[shadyyyy]

Re: Monsters.

Yeah I deFinatly know what you mean, ever since I won the pistol from the shooting range in Westcliff Camp it has been alot easier, because now everything dies in like 2-3 shots lol. But like Hobbes_pwn said it's about having fun aswell. But I hope the have different difficultys in Fable 3, to make it more of a challenge.

 

[Vero Caerso]

Re: Monsters.

I know but you try playing the game over and over about 5 times then saying its still fun. x.x

Im just saying in fable 3 they should have some really difficult things to kill dont you agree?

 

[Aions]

Re: Monsters.

I dont know if any of you have actually considered how easy it is to kill all of the creatures in fable II.

Yeah, its not such a bad thing that you can kill things easily but i dont know about the rest of you but i would prefer a challenge rather than having monsters that i can kill in like one shot.



I dont know how easy people find to kill Banshees but it only takes me acouple of blows from my dragonfire gun or what ever its called to kill it.

Everythings too easy on there, not like they can do anything about it now but im just saying that it should of been alittle harder for people to kill the creatures in fable II.

use crappy wepons then use a rusty clock work pistol and rusty katana if you want fights to last longer

 

[Sasquatchistan]

Re: Monsters.

i go with an iron longsword.

 

[Vero Caerso]

Re: Monsters.

that doesnt have anything to do with making it harder, that just makes the battle last longer. I want to use good weapons instead of using those, i mean seriously why would i want to?

Anyway, time to get back on topic. Anyone else think that fable 3 should have way harder monsters?

 

[Cain]

Re: Monsters.

I like the idea Oblivion had which was as lvled up more stronger monsters appeared in the wilderness or dungeons so it was fair for your level.

 

[Vero Caerso]

Re: Monsters.

Now thats a good idea for fable, but they would have to change it alittle bit so they can make it there own, i mean you dont want it being to similiar to another game or be stealing things from other games.

 

[Arseface]

Re: Monsters.

That's the one thing I noticed - and loved - about Fable 2. It's stupidly easy, but it's still insanely fun to play.

 

[Garth Algar's Revenge]

Re: Monsters.

You're a hero. Its supposed to be easy. Also, you had a freakin legendary wepon in your hand

 

[Vero Caerso]

Re: Monsters.

Freaking ledgendary weapon? Yeah sure buddy, there actually not that great at all, i mean wow i can shoot people really fast dont i feel just special? >.>


No disrespect to fable 2 at all there.

 

[the unknown42]

Re: Monsters.

i call it: The Enforcer. 1 shot kill on everything.... anyway, it really isnt about killling stuff(it meaning the game) like, i got full experience in everything before the main quest ended, so after that i didnt bother killing stuff. i just finished up all the quests, got the legendary weapons, and bought every building in the game. then i kept changing my alignment back and forth cause i couldnt decide what was cooler . but yeah its not about killing.