Whether you like it or not, Fable 3 failed. It took just about everything good from Fable 2 and either watered it down or cut it out entirely, and, considering Fable 2 was nowhere near as good as the original, that's a really, really bad thing.
The customisation... epic. I'm about 70% there. Most of the weapons, keys, gnomes, outfits, etc. but not all... yet.Well that's not entirely true. To fix this statement it should read 'whether you like it or not fable 3 failed ME', because in my opinion fable 3 is the best yet.
The differences between the first game and the most recent one are great enough for me' to understand that some people liked the first one more. But why do you feel the second one was worse than the first?
I personally value the ability to customize your character how you'd like them to be, the first one introduced morality morphs, the second one introduced purity morphs, clothing (because the armor no longer provided a benefit in combat, all clothing became personalized) and the third one introduced weapon morphs and a general world morph and the extreme morph. This is just one reason why I feel the way I do.
And to the guy that almost has everything, don't quit!!! I'm envious of your 99% but you've gotta stretch it to 100!
I personally value the ability to customize your character how you'd like them to be, the first one introduced morality morphs, the second one introduced purity morphs, clothing (because the armor no longer provided a benefit in combat, all clothing became personalized) and the third one introduced weapon morphs and a general world morph and the extreme morph. This is just one reason why I feel the way I do.
I love The Sims 3. So much fun also I feel it has a little bit of Fable in it with these opportunities.I completed 3 times, did most of the things on each, stopped playing, started playing The Sims 3 and New Vegas...
Well that's not entirely true. To fix this statement it should read 'whether you like it or not fable 3 failed ME', because in my opinion fable 3 is the best yet.
The differences between the first game and the most recent one are great enough for me' to understand that some people liked the first one more. But why do you feel the second one was worse than the first?
I personally value the ability to customize your character how you'd like them to be, the first one introduced morality morphs, the second one introduced purity morphs, clothing (because the armor no longer provided a benefit in combat, all clothing became personalized) and the third one introduced weapon morphs and a general world morph and the extreme morph. This is just one reason why I feel the way I do.
And to the guy that almost has everything, don't quit!!! I'm envious of your 99% but you've gotta stretch it to 100!
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Fable II, but the first one is certainly better in all aspects, be it gameplay or story. One thing that bothered me in II was the lack of mistery, of a Fabley feel that it's predecessor concealed with it's lore and art style.Well that's not entirely true. To fix this statement it should read 'whether you like it or not fable 3 failed ME', because in my opinion fable 3 is the best yet.
The differences between the first game and the most recent one are great enough for me' to understand that some people liked the first one more. But why do you feel the second one was worse than the first?
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love Fable II, but the first one is certainly better in all aspects, be it gameplay or story. One thing that bothered me in II was the lack of mistery, of a Fabley feel that it's predecessor concealed with it's lore and art style.
It felt really watered down to appeal to wider audiences which is good for newcomers to the series, but not to fans of the original. Now in a completely out of place statement, I also thought that Fable III had absolutely NO lore. I mean, where are the books? the descriptions for each item? The really intriguing sidequests?
Anyhow OT:
I've seen and done everything this game has to offer, I have all the items minus two elusive makeups and I've run out of things to do. I shall wait patiently for Nov. 23
Certainly, but first I didn't know purity morphs were removed I just thought they were hidden. I have a hero who lowered rent and was good and one that left rent the same and there is a noticeable difference in the glow, eye color etc.
Also, are you sure there are less clothes in fable 3 than in fable 2? Last I counted there are 92 (not including Hals armor) in fable 2 and 107 (not including both highlander sets and the industrial armor). So I think that fact checks out.
As for 'actually 'correct'' reasons, how about the touch system, the improved graphics, the gnomes, 3d gui's instead of menus and yeah I really like the story better in 3 than 2. Plus I got attached to Walter, Sabine, ben Finn, swift, and almost page. In fable 2 I only really connected with the dog and hammer. Plus I love how creepy the crawler is. Much better villain than lucien as I consider Lucien just another one of theresa's puppets so a more apt comparison would be Lucien v. Logan and yeah I love Logan. The one piece of paper you read from him talking about Albion is incredibly moving. Especially when you realize where he's coming from.
First off, you seem to be pretending I'm talking about Fable 2. No, Fable 2 was terrible, too. And as for your "Actually correct" reasons, the touch system was pure crud (Hey, Mister jail escapee! Hold my hand so we can merrily skip back to the guard together!), the characters were nowhere close to being as attaching as the original(And what happened to being given the choice to kill them?). I mean, Whisper was such a good character. Had a specific little nickname for you, always competed against you, had a mean-spirited brother, teamed with you, and even begged you not to kill her off. What did Sabine do to make you care? Make you go through annoying tasks in the beginning and curse you if you don't fulfill your promise to him. Both Lucien and Logan as villains sucked, Hammer was annoying as all holy hell (So I guess they did draw a good connection between us two... why the hell couldn't I kill the bi*** again?), and the Crawler was rushed and didn't engage as an opponent.
Care to come up with some more factually false information for me to shred up like junk mail from The Tire Co.?
You're going to make it very difficult on yourself in these parts if you keep on. It's an OPINION. There are no factual opinions. A fact: There are stores to buy in Bowerstone. An Opinion: There aren't enough stores to buy in Bowerstone.
Let me show you.
Fact: Hammer is a character in Fable 2.
Opinion: Hammer was "annoying as all holy hell."
Fact: Lucien and Logan are Fable villians.
Opinion: Lucien and Logan as villians sucked.
Fact: The Crawler is a creature in Fable 3.
Opinion: The Crawler was rushed and didn't engage you as a player.
Fact: Fable 3 has a touch system.
Opinion: Fable 3's touch system is pure crud.
Would you like me to continue? I can say the sky is blue but it doesn't make it fact. I could say Fable 3 is the best gave evar!!!!111 and that wouldn't be fact either. My opinions aren't fact, they are opinions, just like yours, and neither one is true or false. The only person your opinions are true for are you.
/rant.
I like how you quoted my opinions, yet twisted all of his/her opinions into facts. Nowhere did he/she simply say "Fable 3 had a touch system" or "Lucien and Logan are Fable villains", and if he/she did, It'd be lovely if you'd point it out for me.
Zangash, read it again! She is merely pointing out what is fact and what is opinion and how they differ!