• Welcome to the Fable Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Fable series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

The Ending of Fable 3 Sucks

-Spoilers Possible Below-
I can't say that the ending to III was terrible, I mean atleast there was actually a battle, that being compared to a one-shot kill in II. Though, I suppose the ending did lack in the moral industry, seeing as no matter what you did there was always a downside. Walter Dies, Swift Dies, Randomly Generated Npcs Die.
Atleast your dog dosen't DIE =)
 
I liked the ending. Actually, the story was the best thing in-game.
They should move over CGI movies industry and forget about video games
if you ask me.
 
Dark Intellect said:
I liked the ending. Actually, the story was the best thing of the game. They should move over CGI
movies industry and forget about video games if you ask me.
Click to expand...

Yeah, apart from all the glaring plotholes and the sheer number of things that don't make sense at all, yeah it's got a good story.
 
Arseface said:
Yeah, apart from all the glaring plotholes and the sheer number of things that don't make sense at all, yeah it's got a good story.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it is in many ways when you take the game only by doing the main
quests. That's just my opinion.
 
Dark Intellect said:
Yeah, it is in many ways when you take the game only by doing the main
quests. That's just my opinion.
Click to expand...

I think the main quest is the part that has all the plotholes and things that don't make sense.
 
Arseface said:
I think the main quest is the part that has all the plotholes and things that don't make sense.
Click to expand...
Fine. Post all the plot-holes you know and I will clear them up for
you. If I can't clear them up then you are right.
 
Dark Intellect said:
Fine. Post all the plot-holes you know and I will clear them up for
you. If I can't clear them up then you are right.
Click to expand...

this_is_a_load_of_barnacles____by_no0dle23-d41w1ge.png
 
Dark Intellect said:
Fine. Post all the plot-holes you know and I will clear them up for
you. If I can't clear them up then you are right.
Click to expand...

Challenge accepted!

All the decisions you make as king are pointless and don't make any sense. Why can't I take austerity measures for a year and then be a good ruler after that? Nope, gotta have those pointless "consequence" things, otherwise it's not Fable. But the funny thing is that I can just busk and make all the money required anyway, without making any of the bad decisions.

The fact that Logan is painted as a cruel tyrant, but then halfway through the story it flips to him just trying to save up for the Crawler. Then why, at the start, does he force you to choose between killing your girlfriend or a bunch of strangers? That is a defining moment of the development of the story, but it doesn't make any sense at all.

They're the biggest two. I'll post more if I think about it.
 
Arseface said:
Challenge accepted!

All the decisions you make as king are pointless and don't make any sense. Why can't I take austerity measures for a year and then be a good ruler after that? Nope, gotta have those pointless "consequence" things, otherwise it's not Fable. But the funny thing is that I can just busk and make all the money required anyway, without making any of the bad decisions.

The fact that Logan is painted as a cruel tyrant, but then halfway through the story it flips to him just trying to save up for the Crawler. Then why, at the start, does he force you to choose between killing your girlfriend or a bunch of strangers? That is a defining moment of the development of the story, but it doesn't make any sense at all.

They're the biggest two. I'll post more if I think about it.
Click to expand...
Simple, it's called Molyneux'd. The plot makes sense if you forget
that it has been Molyneux'd. It works like "owned" but it's far worse.
 
Arseface said:
Challenge accepted!

All the decisions you make as king are pointless and don't make any sense. Why can't I take austerity measures for a year and then be a good ruler after that? Nope, gotta have those pointless "consequence" things, otherwise it's not Fable. But the funny thing is that I can just busk and make all the money required anyway, without making any of the bad decisions.

The fact that Logan is painted as a cruel tyrant, but then halfway through the story it flips to him just trying to save up for the Crawler. Then why, at the start, does he force you to choose between killing your girlfriend or a bunch of strangers? That is a defining moment of the development of the story, but it doesn't make any sense at all.

They're the biggest two. I'll post more if I think about it.
Click to expand...

1. I see what you're getting at, but frankly, I don't think that a one-to-two year rushed game would have the option make a decision whenever you saw fit.
2. They were probally writing the storyline as they developed it, decided to go with "ooh, I know, the hero's brother was actually a good guy, but we can kill him anyway!"
 
IMesh said:
1. I see what you're getting at, but frankly, I don't think that a one-to-two year rushed game would have the option make a decision whenever you saw fit.
2. They were probally writing the storyline as they developed it, decided to go with "ooh, I know, the hero's brother was actually a good guy, but we can kill him anyway!"
Click to expand...
I think you're wrong. I believe they reached a point where Design and
actual development were involved in a crash and they started removing
things from the game for the sake for it to reach Gold in the
scheduled time for release as asked by Microsoft.

Therefore they started removing things from the game at the time and
they had to *fix* them with some kind of cheap brown glue.
 
Or because LionHead haven't produced a half decent game since Fable 2 and Microsoft are greedy money grabbers?
 
Zjuggernaut said:
Or because LionHead haven't produced a half decent game since Fable 2 and Microsoft are greedy money grabbers?
Click to expand...
Fable 2 was half good. You can see the other half of Fable 2 in Fable 3,
therefore it's a complete game.
 
Dark Intellect said:
I think you're wrong. I believe they reached a point where Design and
actual development were involved in a crash and they started removing
things from the game for the sake for it to reach Gold in the
scheduled time for release as asked by Microsoft.

Therefore they started removing things from the game at the time and
they had to *fix* them with some kind of cheap brown glue.
Click to expand...
Correct, the whole king portion of the game, as well as the actual revolution were changed 6 months before release.
Dark Intellect said:
Simple, it's called Molyneux'd. The plot makes sense if you forget
that it has been Molyneux'd. It works like "owned" but it's far worse.
Click to expand...
This is a terrible answer, as you did not answer anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top