Of course it shouldn't be limited.
But there is such a thing as "good taste".
It shouldn't be limited but it'd be nice if the people who made these stupid pictures were exposed so everyone would know how disrespectful they were, then they could use their freedom of speech to tell them how pathetic they are.
That really wouldn't make a bit of difference with them, because they wouldn't care. In fact they'd find even more amusement in it knowing that people are up in a fit over what they did. The best solution would be to try to ignore them because that's what they're shooting for, a reaction.It shouldn't be limited but it'd be nice if the people who made these stupid pictures were exposed so everyone would know how disrespectful they were, then they could use their freedom of speech to tell them how pathetic they are.
You're right, it is subjective. Just about anything can be treated like a fact in society if you have enough people to gain the majority vote on what's wrong or right.Good taste is a subjective and relative thing. You can go on about how an extreme such as this is self-evidently in bad taste, but you'll never build a convincing argument for your cause. The only reason you aren't being proven wrong in this case is that you'd be hard-pressed to find someone who disagrees with you in this instance.
You have every right to think what you'd like of them and to tell them so. It wouldn't be free speech if you didn't.