Ericka would you please shut the **** up about it? I try to be nice by asking you to type more "Properly". I cant understand much text talk. So please only fable 3 ,or fable talk on my posts. I want answers,and opinions. Not unrelated stuff.
Ericka would you please shut the **** up about it? I try to be nice by asking you to type more "Properly". I cant understand much text talk. So please only fable 3 ,or fable talk on my posts. I want answers,and opinions. Not unrelated stuff.
Ericka would you please shut the **** up about it? I try to be nice by asking you to type more "Properly". I cant understand much text talk. So please only fable 3 ,or fable talk on my posts. I want answers,and opinions. Not unrelated stuff.
Serious offence? For what? Saying the F word? Calling her what she is? Im confused,but I'll be glad when everyone just gets back to talking about fable.Tyler. What you just did is a serious offense. I'm gonna have to report you this time around.
Erika. Don't continue the flaming, it will prove fruitless and will just get you sancioned too.
Both of you stop now. You also double posted, which is usually just frowned upon.
Is it really that hard to understand why is it bad to call a woman an "idiotic whore", or to tell her to shut the **** up? If so, I wouldn't go around calling people idiots. You might end up confused in who truly is the imbecile.Serious offence? For what? Saying the F word? Calling her what she is? Im confused,but I'll be glad when everyone just gets back to talking about fable.
You are. Just back away from the argument and report it. Trust me, I know.Not tryin to flame, i would hope im allowed to defend myself. i wanted to talk about fable, and have but i also call it as i see it. thank you for intervening, now it seems i wont have to defend myself further.
You are. Just back away from the argument and report it. Trust me, I know.
*Flasback* Grimwhim *Flashback*
I also have an arch nemesis >.> JohnDoe >.>
Is it really that hard to understand why is it bad to call a woman an "idiotic whore", or to tell her to shut the **** up? If so, I wouldn't go around calling people idiots. You might end up confused in who truly is the imbecile.
well, i mean that its still your child, but its not THAT child.Actually mike if you read the fable 3 wiki it will prove that your child in fable 2 is the hero in fable 3...Strange I know,but thats what lionhead studios is saying...
exacly, assuming it takes almost a year(cut off a few months) for it to be born, i read somewhere you start around 19 years old, which makes since, the hero had the child 30 years after fable 2, it took a "year" to be born, and 19 years later fable 3 starts, making you 19....well, i mean that its still your child, but its not THAT child.
Your character can have another child about 30 years later, then 20 years after that is when this new fable takes place
I hope, if you had children at the end of Fable II (even after going to the Spire) they will be in the story somehow, even if it's just in a prologue speech by Theresa or something like, "your father the king and his queen has passed away and your sister has left to live with her fiance" or something. You know, to make the whole thing more accurate and real.
I mean, the excuse of inaccurate historical documents or that they "are so inconsistent" worked when the previous Hero lived 500 years earlier and is only a distant ancestor of the new Hero in Fable II, but it won't work when your older sibling or siblings suddenly has been erased from existence.
I think your childeren off of fable 2 were only human...i think....... and as for this infamous Queen? I havn't heard anything about her, i wondor what the deal is with her