• Welcome to the Fable Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Fable series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

Arseface
Reaction score
813

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I wasn't expecting them to, I'm trying to learn more about the subject but I was just thinking about that.
    Er, yeah I worded that wrong. If it gets into the brain, and runs it itself.
    See I was thinking about number three. Viruses can freeze and you can bring them back, whereas cells freeze and you can't bring those back. Explains why humans freeze, why cyrotubes would never work. But what if you created a virus that flooded the whole body and took over the system, without negatively affecting the person, kill that person and bring back the virus. Wouldn't the virus take over the brain and organs and the person would come back?
    What is your stance on Time Travel / Teleportation / Bringing the dead back to life. As in do you believe that some of those are possible ?
    See? Our wildlife is so overmatched by the Americans who live here that they can hardly manage to survive-- they have that lean, holy-****-I'm-gonna-die edge. But it's only an exceptional Australian who can take the fight to the dreaded crocodile warlords of the north. They're fat and complacent.

    I'm glad.

    That would explain many conversations I've had with you.

    I call bull****. I've ALWAYS called bull****. Cheerleading isn't a sport, either, just an elaborate, inefficient way of attempting the most flamboyant suicide possible.
    Well, yeah. You had ONE croc hunter, and you lost him in tragic circumstances. With nobody to hunt them, they're running wild. We have many, un-famous croc hunters. And Floridiots are used to finding the things in their back yards and calling for help.

    You're right. I just don't give a rat's ass about cricket. Do you feel better?

    Well, yes, this argument was balls-out stupid "which sport is better" is an entirely subjective question. But that doesn't irritate me like your claiming that because YOU like cricket better everyone else who doesn't is wrong, because you are the final, unbiased arbiter of all things ball-and-bat game.

    Is war a sport? Is chess a sport? Is competiting for the same hooker a sport? Going after the same job?
    Nah, your fat, lazy lizards got nothing on our lithe, agressive beasts.

    No. It. Doesn't. I've experienced both soccer and baseball. That doesn't make my opinion (baseball is more fun, soccer is easier to do (just need a ball, no bat, gloves, field)) any more valid than that of another guy, who's played them both and thinks soccer sucks and baseball is great, or vice versa, or hates them both. It also doesn't make my opinion any less biased than that of, say Cal Ripken, Jr, who played baseball for years, owns a baseball team, and lends his name to a youth baseball league. Whether you LIKE something or not is purely biased, purely opinion.

    No offense, but claiming otherwise is balls-out stupid.

    Nah. They're both one specific kind of sport-- apples. Fruits are sports in general (f'rinstance, oranges are probably ball games like soccer and all), food would be... competitive human activities? Let's say vegetables are games, the more uncomfortable drugs are war, and so on.
    Look, who'd you bet to win a fight-- the Guinness record holder for "fattest person on Earth" or a Aussie SAS trooper? I bet you'd go with the skinny little **** of a SAS.

    No, you're not. You're just as partisan as I am. Being more knowledgeable doesn't make you unbiased. The fact that I know a lot about the English major doesn't make me unbiased when I say it sucks balls. Neither does the fact that you know something about baseball and cricket makes you unbiased.

    Also, who says? This is the second time we had this argument. So I probably knew just about as much as you, Mr. I-played-t-ball-once.

    Nah, I'm sticking with my apples-to-different-kind-of-apples comparison. Apples-to-oranges would be, say, cricket vs. hockey. Both fruits, but very different. Baseball and cricket are *******, estranged cousins. Like rugby and football.
    F
    i still hate those damn cliff racers. Good think Jiub cleared them so they didn't have to be in oblivion :D
    F
    Yeah, But why do that every 1000 times you get infected by a cliff racer disease. It gets annoying lmao. And you're right about the cheap potion :p
    F
    Fighting vampires, Storming in caverns, Getting goldbrand from the daedric prince under water! And searching down broken ships underwater :)
    F
    Lmao, Bretons are nubs. Argonian and khajiit ftw! :p
    F
    Hey arse :p, I was wondering what race were you in morrowind and oblivion?
    OH****! Yesterday was your birthday! Happy 19th, young'un.

    (Yes, I will cling to ever instant of age I have on anyone. Also, I realize that, because of the IDL, this might be even later than a day. Ooops.)
    It's not how big they are, it's how you use them.

    Took me awhile to reply to your previous statement calmly, but here: in the US, baseball and football are THE most popular sports. By miles. Football wins, for the most part. Pretty much everyone has a basic understanding of the games, has seen them played or played them. But that doesn't mean that everyone in the country likes football more. Some people prefer baseball. Some people prefer basketball (which is way off at #3, quite a bit down.) Some people prefer soccer, or weird little sports like lacrosse, or yes, cricket.

    Sometimes this splits along geographical lines-- for instance, Anne Arundel County and many others in Maryland LOVE lacrosse. PG County doesn't give a rat's ass. Sometimes it doesn't-- some people I went to high school with (EDIT: In Anne Arundel) hated lacrosse.

    So allow me to emphasize this: you are not unbiased. You like cricket. That's fine. Cricket is big where you live. Also fine. That does not make me liking baseball over cricket any less valid because I live somewhere where cricket isn't popular.

    Our argument was "which is better." That is utter bull****. It's making a comparative argument about which is higher quality. Not an apples-and-oranges argument, since they're related games, but maybe a red delicious-and-golden delicious argument, or a clementine-and-normal orange argument.

    It was just an argument over something immaterial and insoluble. For the hell of it. Not a serious comparison of the two.
    Southern Florida and then all the way through Florida up to the Carolinas. Can't remember which is which.
    If you drop the argument and run away screaming "IT'S AN ACQUIRED TASTE!!!!!!" first, does that mean I win?

    Also, can I point something out? Didn't we both know going into this (many, many posts ago) that neither of us was going to change our mind because we were both so blatantly partisan than we were just going to argue until we were feeling homicidal?

    Also, to revisit and old argument: the US has alligators AND crocodiles, so HA!
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top