Michael Jackson vs Fox News

[Firis]

Michael Jackson vs Fox News

Maybe I am being overly sensitive, but an "EXCLUSIVE" News story posted yesterday (And still front page) is titled on the main page as "Pedophiles on Wikipedia" you click the link and it is about Michael Jackson's family and how they are holding up. That is pretty ****ing low, or am I being too sensitive?

 

[Sean]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

Mm, not really, I think you're fine. I like Fox News but I think using the WHOLE family under Pedophiles on Wikipedia was unnecessary, I think they could have just used the pedophile word for him, but even then everybody screws up and he DID touch little boys and all, but he was the largest pop singer ever, so I don't think it's fair for them to use the pedophile word for the whole family. So I'll back you up on this one, I don't think you're being too sensitive.

 

[Gikoku]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

I don't even care what the clowns at FOX News do, there was never any solid evidence that proved MJ touched a child in a sexual manner. So why worry about it? Ignore it. Besides, FOX News is infamous for its stupidity, television news in general is just stupid.

 

[cheezMcNASTY]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

stupid network. stupid stories.
would you act surprised if you let go of an object and it fell?

 

[Tsuyu]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

They canceled Futurama for crying out loud! How could their trustworthiness be even lower?

 

[HobbeBrain]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

Wasn't MJ cleared of the charges? So nobody can call him a paedophile anyway.

 

[Sean]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

They canceled Futurama?

 

[Skotekal]

Re: Michael Jackson vs Fox News

They canceled Futurama for crying out loud! How could their trustworthiness be even lower?

They did, but they're back.