Orpheus Lupus
The Pretty-Okay Doctor
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2007
- Messages
- 384
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
- Age
- 35
So this kind of bothers me (about perceptions about the game)
I've noticed a lot of people (or some people at least) saying that "This Game Isn't What They Said It Would Be' or that Molyneaux lied to us, etc.
Well, from the extensive time I've been playing the game, I have to disagree with that statement. I'm not saying that means it's some sort of perfect game, or that anyone who doesn't enjoy it is a liar. I'm saying that, to be perfectly honest, the game is pretty much exactly what they said it would be.
For starters, there are a lot of things about it that it has in common with the previous Fable, which I find it absurd to go "I Though It Wouldn't Be Like THat THis Time!" Yes, the game does have it's own sense of humor. It's silly to think it was going to keep a totally straight face all the way through. There's also the fact that you do most of your communicating through expressions, and the fact that the combat is not all that difficult. I have a feeling these will continue throughout the Fable series (a third game seems assured). If you hate that thought, they are not for you.
I could go on and on (there are glitches in every huge game I've ever played, for example, and yes it is unfortunate about the co-op but it's still enjoyable for some of us). But while the game was extremely hyped, I don't find anything particularly contradictory. Games, like any other art, are going to be enjoyable based solely on what you like (in general. There are a few universally terrible games, but those are very, very, very obvious). IF the Fable games (or any others. I odn't like Gears of War, for example, but that doesn't make them awful) really, trually bore or annoy you, it's not that they're terrible. They may literally just not be your type of game.
*Whoo boy*
I've noticed a lot of people (or some people at least) saying that "This Game Isn't What They Said It Would Be' or that Molyneaux lied to us, etc.
Well, from the extensive time I've been playing the game, I have to disagree with that statement. I'm not saying that means it's some sort of perfect game, or that anyone who doesn't enjoy it is a liar. I'm saying that, to be perfectly honest, the game is pretty much exactly what they said it would be.
For starters, there are a lot of things about it that it has in common with the previous Fable, which I find it absurd to go "I Though It Wouldn't Be Like THat THis Time!" Yes, the game does have it's own sense of humor. It's silly to think it was going to keep a totally straight face all the way through. There's also the fact that you do most of your communicating through expressions, and the fact that the combat is not all that difficult. I have a feeling these will continue throughout the Fable series (a third game seems assured). If you hate that thought, they are not for you.
I could go on and on (there are glitches in every huge game I've ever played, for example, and yes it is unfortunate about the co-op but it's still enjoyable for some of us). But while the game was extremely hyped, I don't find anything particularly contradictory. Games, like any other art, are going to be enjoyable based solely on what you like (in general. There are a few universally terrible games, but those are very, very, very obvious). IF the Fable games (or any others. I odn't like Gears of War, for example, but that doesn't make them awful) really, trually bore or annoy you, it's not that they're terrible. They may literally just not be your type of game.
*Whoo boy*