• Welcome to the Fable Community Forum!

    We're a group of fans who are passionate about the Fable series and video gaming.

    Register Log in

Tourists from Outer Space

It's going to be an extremely long time before overpopulation actually becomes a problem. Space exploration could be put on hold for that.
True. But we have start at some point.
I don't think I need to explain the odds of something like that happening.
True. But it does happen when you least expect it.
Replace nuclear energy with geothermal energy, and you've got yourself a damn fine list.
Maybe replacing fission, because the safety is still not 100%. Fusion isn't nearly efficient enough, but it is totally clean and no radioactivity. Geothermal energy is very interesting...

In general, I agree with both our points. I mean, exploring space is quote an undertaking. Who knows how much time and money it may cost? And what risks are involved? And what will suffer onEarth, when we have to divide our attention? But still... Come on. Exploring SPACE, isn't that frikken' awesome? Eventually, it should become an inevitability

Hey, we have real problems up here, like cosmic rays, and a lack of an atmosphere.
And internet?
 
Maybe replacing fission, because the safety is still not 100%. Fusion isn't nearly efficient enough, but it is totally clean and no radioactivity.

Hmm...I didn't think that there was any kind of nuclear energy that was 100% safe. What's the difference between fission and fusion exactly?

Eventually, it should become an inevitability

One would hope so.
 
Hmm...I didn't think that there was any kind of nuclear energy that was 100% safe. What's the difference between fission and fusion exactly?

Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which a heavy nucleus splits spontaneously or on impact with another particle, with the release of energy. Nuclear fusion is a nuclear reaction in which atomic nuclei of low atomic number fuse to form a heavier nucleus with the release of energy.

Nuclear fusion is that what we use today, and receives a lot of negative response because of the safety risks. Aside from that, it's clean, efficient and durable, but the few disasters that have happened were catastrophic enough to make people want to ban it altogether. Nuclear fission on the other hand does not release radioactivity, and as a result is much more promising. However, the problem here is that its energy efficiency is still negative. We essentially recreate the process of the sun, but because we don't have that kind of pressure here, we raise the temperature about ten(if I recall correctly) times. And that takes a lot of energy. Scientists are still working on this and try to develop a way to harness a lot of energy, because it has great potential.
 
I understand that expanding our species (God forbid) and starting colonies elsewhere in the universe could potentially mean the survival of our species but haven't we gotten a large sum of problems on our current planet right now? If we can't live like civilized and meaningful beings on this planet why should we deserve to go exploring the space and possibly meeting other species? We can barely afford wars on this planet, I can't imagine the cost for a war in space. It seems like an awful lot of money to be spending on a project which is already far away from being successful or even tested for that matter, when we have an economic problem, not just the US but the world.

Oh well. Someone in NASA, or multiple people, are probably smoking a big fat cuban right now, sweating with joy over the big pile of cash they just got from the Government after showing the World how "useful" NASA still is.
 
I understand that expanding our species (God forbid) and starting colonies elsewhere in the universe could potentially mean the survival of our species but haven't we gotten a large sum of problems on our current planet right now? If we can't live like civilized and meaningful beings on this planet why should we deserve to go exploring the space and possibly meeting other species? We can barely afford wars on this planet, I can't imagine the cost for a war in space. It seems like an awful lot of money to be spending on a project which is already far away from being successful or even tested for that matter, when we have an economic problem, not just the US but the world.

Oh well. Someone in NASA, or multiple people, are probably smoking a big fat cuban right now, sweating with joy over the big pile of cash they just got from the Government after showing the World how "useful" NASA still is.
We can say that about pretty much anything they do. If they don't spend money on this, they'll spend on something else that only benefits the few higher-ups in society. There would be a minimum chance of the money going to something useful. At least space is beautiful, in contrast to war, disease and whatnot.
 
Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which a heavy nucleus splits spontaneously or on impact with another particle, with the release of energy. Nuclear fusion is a nuclear reaction in which atomic nuclei of low atomic number fuse to form a heavier nucleus with the release of energy.

Nuclear fission is that what we use today, and receives a lot of negative response because of the safety risks. Aside from that, it's clean, efficient and durable, but the few disasters that have happened were catastrophic enough to make people want to ban it altogether. Nuclear fusion on the other hand does not release radioactivity, and as a result is much more promising. However, the problem here is that its energy efficiency is still negative. We essentially recreate the process of the sun, but because we don't have that kind of pressure here, we raise the temperature about ten(if I recall correctly) times. And that takes a lot of energy. Scientists are still working on this and try to develop a way to harness a lot of energy, because it has great potential.

Fixed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arseface
Nuclear fission is a nuclear reaction in which a heavy nucleus splits spontaneously or on impact with another particle, with the release of energy. Nuclear fusion is a nuclear reaction in which atomic nuclei of low atomic number fuse to form a heavier nucleus with the release of energy.

Nuclear fusion is that what we use today, and receives a lot of negative response because of the safety risks. Aside from that, it's clean, efficient and durable, but the few disasters that have happened were catastrophic enough to make people want to ban it altogether. Nuclear fission on the other hand does not release radioactivity, and as a result is much more promising. However, the problem here is that its energy efficiency is still negative. We essentially recreate the process of the sun, but because we don't have that kind of pressure here, we raise the temperature about ten(if I recall correctly) times. And that takes a lot of energy. Scientists are still working on this and try to develop a way to harness a lot of energy, because it has great potential.

Got them around the wrong way.
 
...How did I do tha- /facepalm.

Here, I'll let you borrow this:

.. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. .. . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . .. . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. .. . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . .. .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ...`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
.. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..
 
Here, I'll let you borrow this:

.. . . . . . . . . . . ,.-‘”. . . . . . . . . .``~.,
. . . . . . . .. . . . . .,.-”. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .“-.,
. . . . .. .. . . . . ..,/. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ”:,
. . . .. . . . .. .,?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\,
. .. . . . . . . . /. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,}
. . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`^`.}
. . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:”. . . ./
. . . . . . .?. . . __. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :`. . . ./
. . . . . . . /__.(. . .“~-,_. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:`. . .. .. ./
. . . . . . /(_. . ”~,_. . . ..“~,_. . . . . . . . . .,:`. . . . _/
. . . .. .{.._$;_. . .”=,_. . . .“-,_. . . ,.-~-,}, .~”; /. .. .}
. . .. . .((. . .*~_. . . .”=-._. . .“;,,./`. . /” . . . ./. .. ../
. . . .. . .\`~,. . ..“~.,. . . . . . . . . ..`. . .}. . . . . . ../
. . . . . .(. ..`=-,,. . . .`. . . . . . . . . . . ..(. . . ;_,,-”
. . . . . ../.`~,. . ..`-.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..\. . /\
. . . . . . \`~.*-,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..|,./.....\,__
,,_. . . . . }.>-._\. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .|. . . . . . ...`=~-,
. .. `=~-,_\_. . . `\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
.. . . . . . . . . .`=~-,,.\,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .\
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . `:,, . . . . . . . . . . . . . `\. . . . . . ..__
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .`=-,. . . . . . . . . .,%`>--==``
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _\. . . . . ._,-%. . . ..
Thanks man, I needed that.
 
I understand that expanding our species (God forbid) and starting colonies elsewhere in the universe could potentially mean the survival of our species but haven't we gotten a large sum of problems on our current planet right now?

Because then we could have one planet for all the Christians.

Another one for all the Muslims.

And a final one for all the Jews.

Abracadabra! A good bulk of the world's problems quite literally out the window.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sean
Because then we could have one planet for all the Christians.

Another one for all the Muslims.

And a final one for all the Jews.

Abracadabra! A good bulk of the world's problems quite literally out the window.

Then we can stick a few of them from each planet all onto another planet. We'll make a reality show out of it!
 
Then we can stick a few of them from each planet all onto another planet. We'll make a reality show out of it!

cartman_troll_face_by_kairaplatypus-d3gyy0v.jpg
 
Because then we could have one planet for all the Christians.

Another one for all the Muslims.

And a final one for all the Jews.

Abracadabra! A good bulk of the world's problems quite literally out the window.

I never thought about it like that...