Re: Vehicles in Fable 3
Little_Sparrow;331500 said:
Sure! and while were at it lets add some atom bombs and other explosives! and airplanes and speedboats! in fact lets not call it fable anymore! lets call it ****ing stupid. It defeats the purpose of fable. U add vehicles that means were advancing to the 1890s. Then before you know it were playing Fable: War Against Iraq. Vehicles is ****ing stupid.
Lemme try to be polite here: Please stop making unhelpful, unpleasant posts, okay? You can make your points without being a jackass.
The initial comment on vehicles was dealing with HORSES. Are horses not Fabley enough for you? The rest of the discussion, yes, is about the relative merits, likelihood, and suitability of other kinds of transportation. Again, why not try to make a point that's a little less... acerbically phrased.
Also, allow me to direct you to
this Wikipedia thread on the slippery slope argument, specifically the "as a logical fallacy" bit. I believe it's relative to the rest of your argument.