Like a previous poster said about Margret Sanger, it would be terrible to have to go a class and hear this **** for the time and money spent on getting a degree. My problem with feminists, Handicaps, and Homosexuals, are that they wish for everyone to treat them the same but yet still get the perks of being different.
1) Feminism is absolutely ridiculous ideal presently due to the fact that women do have more power than men in court, they can get alimony while never contributing to the money pool of that marriage, they can get child support even though she may have found another person to raise the children by bypassing the loophole of not being married to her new boyfriend, and lastly they can accuse men of rape or sexual assault if they feel like it.
2) Though i find no ill to people that have any type of disability, i do find ill on those that want others to treat them the same but still get the perks of being disabled. if someone doesn't want to be treated like a normal person, they can use the perks, but if someone wants to be treated like a normal person, they shouldn't use handicap spots or handicap doors and such (though they can still use elevators cause a wheelchair up a flight of stairs is impossible)
3) My problem with gay community is the fact that they want to take a word that is and has always been a word from god which is marriage, to me they should get another word and still be able to get the same benefits including: pain, alimony, suffering, child support, and such (jk). The word Marriage is between "a man and a women" in the book of god homosexuality is a sin, so for the gay community to try and take that word is appalling. if i lived in California i would vote for prop 8 (or what ever the opposition is to gay marriage) but if they wanted civil unions i would be all for it.
