Re: Is this really a lollie?
Pirate X;349024 said:
Again, the US has enough nukes to destroy the world a few times over. If the entire UN versused the US, we'd win.
And if you knew anything about physics or any of the years of theoretical research that have gone into the after effect of using atomic bombs, then you'd also know that that would make the world completely uninhabitable to anything but the most basic life. You'd still lose in the end.
Besides, China could unleash a massive dose of woopass on you if it wanted too.
Pirate X;349024 said:
Again, mad that we blew up Japan in World War II.
Yes. Because you killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians to save at most, a few thousand of your own precious soldiers.
But I guess their lives matter less because they're Japanese. :getlost:
Skotekal;349025 said:
Your not the only one with nukes you tool. Gawd, I know flaming is against the rules, but you are a ****ING MORON. Honestly. Nukes are for weak countries. And guess what? You lost the Vietnam war and you bombed the **** out of them. Your country is overrated and only uses nukes as a threat.
I know we're technically on the same "side", but I don't think it's constructive to act like that.
Pirate X;349026 said:
W/e. At least I can type calmy.
How can you condone the usage of atomic weapons on civilians, then take the moral high ground over who manages to type the calmest? There must seriously be some crossed circuits in your brain.