On one hand they have a large following and have spread to causing an international phenomenon. The media couldn't ignore it any longer and it's making it's way into political debates (discussion and actual consideration not so much). Part of the movements strength is because it represents general discontent. It's hard to blame anyone for being discontent given the state of everything, so it's hard if not downright impossible to disagree with their cause.
On the other hand, the weakness in their 'general discontent' is they lack specific demands. The entities they are opposed to range from large corporations, to the richest 1%, to politicians who accept money in exchange for influence from either. Furthermore they have not organized any form of effort to influence politics in their favor. Yes, they are making their voices heard, but the people they want to listen most are the very people they are angry with. The Tea Party worked to have their own representatives elected into public office, which the Occupy movement is largely not taken seriously for lacking.
Is there a movement in your area?
Have you attended?
What do you think they will accomplish?
Do you agree with what is being said?
Discuss.
On the other hand, the weakness in their 'general discontent' is they lack specific demands. The entities they are opposed to range from large corporations, to the richest 1%, to politicians who accept money in exchange for influence from either. Furthermore they have not organized any form of effort to influence politics in their favor. Yes, they are making their voices heard, but the people they want to listen most are the very people they are angry with. The Tea Party worked to have their own representatives elected into public office, which the Occupy movement is largely not taken seriously for lacking.
Is there a movement in your area?
Have you attended?
What do you think they will accomplish?
Do you agree with what is being said?
Discuss.