Wow...this has gotten blown way out of proportion.
Consider this. A life of abstinence comes with it considerable difficulty as it has its principles and values and other things that are absent in a life without abstinence. People do not voluntarily take the more difficult path unless they feel it will be more rewarding in some way. Regardless of what the reward for him might be, that he seeks a personal gain in a more difficult lifestyle that he could not get by forgoing abstinence, wouldn't it make more sense to assume that he has already asked himself why?
Well, there was no assuming in my dialogue with him. I didn't assume that he had or hadn't thought about why he didn't want to have premarital sex. I was just curious, so I asked. It's as simple as that.
Do people who care nothing for abstinence have a good reason why outside of societal conditioning to do so? Are "because that's stupid" or "that's just not my thing" valid reasons? Would it not be safer to assume that people who don't abide by these principles haven't put in nearly as much thought into such matters as people who do?
Well, the thing is, you don't really need a reason to not abstain. Biology gives us one, so a lack of abstinence really only requires a lack of reasons to abstain. And to me, it's not really about putting more or less thought into the matter. It's just about putting in enough thought to come to your conclusion, so sure, maybe a person who abstains might have put more thought into their decision than someone who doesn't (I guess it would depend on the people used as examples), but that doesn't really mean a whole lot to me.
Would it not be more logical to think that you have it backwards? Here's what I think, I think you want more people to be like you. If that's what you're going for, say so, but skip the crap. What I really want to know is why you are okay with people like me who are whores but you are seemingly bothered by people like him who aren't. I admire that sort of thing, I praise and encourage it, I envy it even. If I could do it over, that's how I'd do it. And I want to know why you have to give him s*** about it.
I'm not bothered by him or his choices, and I wasn't trying to give him sh*t. I realize that it may have come off that way, but that's not how I intended it. I was just curious, so I asked. Then, when he made his next post, it started with "Dunno," indicating to me that there was a bit of uncertainty. Then, the next thing he said, "Influenced by moral-inducing stuff," I interpreted as him being influenced by societal conditioning, so I wanted to try to help him out. Now, if he had said something different, I might have responded differently. For example, if he said something like, "My brother and his girlfriend had an unwanted pregnancy due to premarital sex, and I don't want that to happen to me," then I would have completely left it alone because that would have been an actual reason to abstain.
He didn't ask because he's curious, he didn't ask because he wants him to be more enlightened or to get some perspective, or to better himself in any way. He's asking because it differs from him, it differs from what he wants and accepts, and that is why he selectively chooses people who follow paths he disagrees with to "ask" these things. That's intolerant and wrong.
I really do take quite a bit of issue with this, but I'm trying not to start a flame war, so I'll just keep it simple. I've already said twice in this post that I asked because I was curious. I guess you could say the fact that it differed from my beliefs was part of what made me curious, but I was not just trying to get him to believe what I believe. If you still think otherwise after reading everything I have to say here, then so be it.
To put this in another context that others would be able to understand better, it would be exactly the same as me asking Tyloric why he's gay, but not asking straight people why they're straight, and rationalizing it as "well I would assume straight people know why they're straight" which implies that gay people don't know why they're gay. So, Necro asks an abstinent person why he's abstinent, but does not ask anyone else why they're not, rationalizing it as "well I would assume people who have premarital sex know why they have premarital sex" which implies that people who abstain don't know why they abstain. It's suggestive as well as a s*** thing to do.
I wasn't asking because I wanted him to think about his beliefs though. That part only came after he gave his answer.
The reason this is wrong is because it's intolerance disguised as philosophy. "I just want you to know why you're the way you are if you're going to be that way". It implies that there's something wrong with it, it tells me that Necro thinks that people who lead that lifestyle are ignorant. If he wanted to just say that, like "I see no reason that I find acceptable to abstain from premarital sex and I think people who do are religious zealots" then whatever, but he is veiling it in condescension and taking jackassery to that level between ignorant kid and intolerant bastard. And the worst part is he doesn't even see it because he has been convinced that this kind of behavior is okay because of "societal conditioning".
Well, again, I wasn't trying to imply that there is something wrong with his choice or that people who live that way are ignorant, because there isn't, and they're not (necessarily).
Come on John, help me out. I'm really trying to avoid a fight here.