Re: Starcraft II
Another update for you Markie:
Revealed: StarCraft II's "Ultimate Heavy-assault Mech" - CVG.com
Another update for you Markie:
Revealed: StarCraft II's "Ultimate Heavy-assault Mech" - CVG.com
§ephiroxa§;126400 said:Heehee, Thanks drunkles. Rep+
Those Koreans sure do love starcraft XD
§ephiroxa§;114356 said:With Halo 3 and Fable 2 and Starcraft II and soo many more, the shiny just never seems to end! :neo:
The assets in our official StarCraft II Fansite Kit are a potential bonanza for those who wish to build their own StarCraft II related fansites. This downloadable package contains the following content, including some exclusive assets:
- Art assets including screenshots, concept art, hi-res logos, and wallpapers
- Site design elements including borders, backgrounds, fonts, and stylesheets
- Exclusive content: Unit renders and forum avatars / Messenger images
- StarCraft II fact sheet and FAQ
- Sample StarCraft II text content
- Site building tips
Ya know, I almost flamed you for that. GRAPHICS AREN'T IMPORTANT. They ARE appreciated, but They are NOT required to be 'OMFG ITS SOOOO GOOD', but atleast not 'WTF?!' And Diablo 2 was NOT 'WTF'...Besides, lets see you do better for a '90's game. It was better then even Warcraft 2. Only Warcraft 3, which was 2001, and Starcraft, 98, beat it. Not to mention the armor and weapons were equipped in real time, so you would be able to tell the difference no matter what you put on. And Diablo 2 was more about the skill, and strategy, then the graphics.nexsus;136351 said:starcraft2 has the best graphics i've seen in any real time stratedgy game, even on low quality streamer!
although, im not sure about a starcraft 2 rpg or mmo. i know it will be on battle net but i think its strength lies in its solo play/story/ZERG!
edit:
i hear they'd like to look into diablo, but there preoccupied with their more successful titles, warcraft/starcraft.
i don't see whats so good about diablo tho, poor qaulity graphics
Kaireg;137084 said:Ya know, I almost flamed you for that. GRAPHICS AREN'T IMPORTANT. They ARE appreciated, but They are NOT required to be 'OMFG ITS SOOOO GOOD', but atleast not 'WTF?!' And Diablo 2 was NOT 'WTF'...Besides, lets see you do better for a '90's game. It was better then even Warcraft 2. Only Warcraft 3, which was 2001, and Starcraft, 98, beat it. Not to mention the armor and weapons were equipped in real time, so you would be able to tell the difference no matter what you put on. And Diablo 2 was more about the skill, and strategy, then the graphics.
Kaireg;137092 said:Never! I will if I want!
Still, I wish SC2 doesnt come out till after February, so I'll have my more godly computer to play it, and every other game I have, at full power >.>...
Kaireg;137120 said:and what is this...'kit'?