JohnDoe;320678 said:
Hal;320562 said:The film is an adaption of one of the books, the fall of reach. Bioshock would be amazing and so would gears of war but they only have the games and thats it. Halo has a whole load of other stuff like the ghosts of Onyx, first strike which means a huge story to explore without it being based on the games. And Halo kicks ass, so does Bungie. Deal with it.
Hal;320731 said:Ok there will be no flood coz the movie script sent by stuart beattie has it set at the fall of reach. Its an adaption of one of the Halo Books rather than the games. So don't worry about a crappy game movie when its based on a book. I think the movie is meant to explain the whole spartan thing and give a idea of what the fall of reach was like.
Skotekal;320869 said:A movie should never be made from a game
Hal;320565 said:Stuart beattie has sent a script to microsoft and is waiting for approval. And sorry for beating you to the books
Heres a poster for it.
![]()
ScareCrowReturn;320920 said:Is it me, Or does it say 2007????
Sean;320923 said:I was just wondering that myself.
@Hal,
BioShock would be a good movie because it's a great plot, and it was a great game, which you still don't know all the secrets too. Halo is just getting bland at this point, it should've ended at Halo 3. Bungie just thinks they are so much more than they really are. Either way, any movie based off of a game would be bad. Bioshock would just be a good idea.
Besides, Call of Duty is better than Halo.
Lose the zeroes (Bungie)! Get with the heroes(InfinityWard)!![]()